Friday, December 19, 2014

What's in a Name?

Coming up with and keeping track of names can be a tricky thing, folks. Especially if you're talking about NBA franchises that are constantly moving around. One might easily confuse one team for another.





You see, there used to be a team called the Seattle Supersonics. That team is now known as the Oklahoma City Thunder. But hold on, let's not get ahead of ourselves. The road to that name is just one piece of the puzzle.




Originally, there was also another team named the Charlotte Hornets. When the Charlotte Bobcats entered the league back in 2002 as an expansion team, the Hornets moved to New Orleans and became the New Orleans Hornets.



Oh, yeah, that reminds me. There's a team in the NBA known as the Utah Jazz. That's right. UTAH JAZZ. Two words that should never be within 5 miles of each other. Why would a team curse itself with such an unfitting name for its city? Well, the fact is, the Utah Jazz were once located in New Orleans. They were called the New Orleans Jazz, a much more appropriate name for that city that Utah.

But back to the Bobcats and Hornets for a second. After the Charlotte Hornets moved to New Orleans, there was a small natural and political disaster known as Hurricane Katrina. During that time, New Orleans was ravaged by the aftermath of the storm and playing NBA basketball in New Orleans was simply impossible. So, for the next year or so, the New Orleans Hornets played their home games in Oklahoma City and were even known as the New Orleans/Oklahoma City Thunder.

And here we rejoin the aforementioned Seattle Supersonics, who were still in the NBA at this time. For whatever reason, ownership wanted to move the team the hell out of Washington state. Many Sonics fans were now bereft of a team. Oklahoma City, which had proven to be capable of hosting an NBA team, got a more permanent one when the Seattle Supersonics moved to the city where the New Orleans Hornets had played their home games the year before. They also got a name change, becoming the Oklahoma City Thunder. Nick Collison and Kevin Durant are currently the only members of the team who have played for the team since it was located in Seattle.


But hold on, we're not quite done, I'm afraid. For whatever reason, the New Orleans Hornets didn't seem to like their team name very much anymore and became the New Orleans... Pelicans. That's right, Pelicans. Well, they are seabirds, after all, and New Orleans is adjacent to the third coast, so I guess it works. Still kind of an odd name, in my opinion. But wait! That means the Hornets name that had been around since the formation of the Charlotte Hornets was gone! Would they become like the Supersonics, a name that no longer has any meaning except to aging fans of a state now without a team?



Alas, no. You see, the Charlotte Bobcats, the mediocre expansion team which finally had some moderate success in later years, saw this opportunity and pounced on it. They took the name of Charlotte Hornets for themselves, despite being completely unconnected to the original Charlotte Hornets. So the Bobcats and not the Hornets would be the team without a name... Of course, they waited a whole year to take the name. I mean did they not see it just sitting there? Neither the Charlotte nor New Orleans Hornets existed during the 2013-2014 season.

I feel I would be remiss if I did not mention that the team is partially owned by Michael Jordan, who of course played for the Chicago Bulls in the NBA but also played for North Carolina (located in Charlotte) in his college years.

And there you have it. So here is a timeline of the team names and their confusing path to the present.

Seattle Supersonics 1967-2008
Oklahoma City Thunder 2008-present
New Orleans Jazz 1974-1979
Utah Jazz 1979-present
Charlotte Hornets 1988-2002
New Orleans Hornets 2002-2005, 2007-2013
New Orleans/Oklahoma City Hornets 2005-2007
New Orleans Pelicans 2013-present
Charlotte Bobcats 2002-2014
Charlotte Hornets 2014-present


It should also be mentioned that the Sacramento Kings ownership recently tried to move the team to Seattle, but the league did not allow it. That would have brought a whole other franchise into this trainwreck.

Sunday, September 28, 2014

End of an Era

Paul Konerko (left) and Derek Jeter.

If you have read some of my past posts on this blog, you would know I am a big baseball fan. I have been a fan since I was a young kid, probably around 4 or 5 years old. It's the sport I've known the longest and holds a special place in my heart. It is also the sport I started playing when I was the youngest, around 7 years old. I played organized baseball from then until my junior year in high school. I would have played my senior year, but my friends convinced me to run track with them.

When I was growing up, I idolized the players in the big leagues who played the game better than I could ever dream of playing. As I grew older, many of these players retired and very few of them remain today. After tomorrow, at least two of the players I grew up watching will be gone. 

Konerko.

One of them is Paul Konerko of the Chicago White Sox. Primarily a first baseman, Konerko, or PK as some call him, was a very good offensive first baseman, hitting for power and average. He was also pretty good defensively. In 2005, he helped the White Sox win the World Series. Aside from parts of two seasons in the late 90's, Konerko played for the White Sox his entire career, and has been on the team since 1999.

While Konerko may not ultimately wind up in the Hall of Fame, he will certainly have his supporters, and you could definitely make a case for him. Konerko is a .279 career hitter, a very respectable average, and has 439 career home runs, as well as 1412 RBI, 2340 hits, and 1192 runs scored. His career OBP is .347, he has a career slugging percentage of .487, and a career OPS. (Thanks, baseball-reference.) Impressive numbers, yes, but the Hall is very difficult to get in to. Other things to note, as mentioned, he was a World Series champion in 2005, and also a six-time All-Star. His numbers are comparable to Fred McGriff, David Ortiz, Jim Rice, Jason Giambi, Orlando Cepeda, Dave Winfield, and Willie Stargell, among others. Some of these players are HOFers, some are tainted or clouded by the issue of steroids, and some are simply borderline hall of famers. His 2340 hits, while very good, are nowhere near the "magic number" of 3000. He may be helped a bit by the fact that he played for one team for so long. Or that may not help at all.

In any case, Paul was very popular in Chicago and had a very good career. He did not play in a big-market city like Los Angeles, Boston, or New York. For me, I say he could be in the Hall. But ultimately, that conversation is for another day. Now is the time for sports fans to look back on his career and celebrate it. This year, Paul has played mostly in a reserve role. At 38, he is younger than the other player in this article. One would think he might try to play a little longer, but injuries and slowed production over the past year or so have unfortunately hastened the end of his career. He will be missed.

Jeter.

And the other player who is retiring, in case you haven't heard, is Derek Jeter. Ah, yes, Derek Jeter. I remember the apex of the Red Sox rivalry during my lifetime, back in the late nineties and early 2000's. Jeter was often compared with Nomar Garciaparra, and Boston fans would insist that Nomar was the better shortstop. And to be honest, during his time with the Red Sox, I still contend that Nomar was better. Two batting titles, more power than Jeter, and a better batting average, the defensive skills somewhat of a wash. Nomar was fast; Jeter perhaps a bit faster. Nomar was clearly the better hitter at the time. However, after leaving Boston, Nomar's career was derailed by injuries (a process that might have started when he was still with the Red Sox.). He would have one more great year and a few decent years before retiring in 2009, at the age of 36. Jeter however, continued to play for several more years. 

Jeter did not decline at the same time as Nomar. He put up solid offensive numbers until his final year, which wasn't bad. He did not spend significant time injured until his penultimate season in 2013. When all was said and done, Jeter had played 20 seasons, accumulated 3460+ hits (6th all time), held a lifetime .309 average, 1923 runs scored, and various other unfathomable statistics. He will certainly be a first ballot Hall-of-Famer. His longevity and consistent solid play, rarely uninterrupted by injuries (from his first full season to his last, he had over 500 at bats every season but 2013, when he missed almost the entire season), put some of his offensive marks very high on the all-time list. We're talking top 5, top 10 EVER. 

Despite being the only New York Yankee to ever record 3000 hits, Jeter is considered only the 6th best Yankee ever. The five generally mentioned ahead of him are Babe Ruth, the longtime home run king, Lou Gehrig, the original Iron Man, Joe DiMaggio, best known for his apparently unbreakable record 56-game hitting streak, Mickey Mantle, considered one of the best centerfielders of all time, and Yogi Berra, that catcher who makes the funny statement (and a Hall-of-Famer). Again, longevity really helped Jeter's legacy. But, like Gehrig, Ripken, Yaz, and others who played for a long time with one team, you have to be really good and really well-liked. I know I keep mentioning the fact that these guys played for one team, but that is very significant and rare in today's game, where short-term contracts and disloyalty are the name of the game. It's truly remarkable that Jeter and last year's Jeter, Mariano Rivera, played for one team their entire career, because in recent years, that has not happened very often. This is true for all sports.

A nice moment.

Jeter's goodbye tour is more widely publicized than Konerko's. This is to be expected, considering he played for the New York Yankees and won five World Series championships. Of course, being a Red Sox fan (especially with the way the Red Sox season has gone), I get kind of tired of this at times. Because it seems forced or fake (what with the big deal commercials, etc.) On the other hand, I understand. He's Derek Jeter. He is the face of baseball and has been for a long time. Who will represent the sport now? These shoes are big to fill indeed. It's going to be weird for the Yankees now, as Jeter's number will certainly be retired, and no one will ever wear a single digit number for the team again. 

When it's all said and done - and I'm done saying things - both these players meant a great deal to their city, baseball itself, and team sports in general. It's special these days to see a player spend so many years on one team, and to play so well. When these two players hang up the cleats for the last time tomorrow, baseball will have a void there that can never truly be filled. It's been a pleasure watching you guys compete all these years. Good luck in whatever comes next.




Friday, May 23, 2014

Life and Loss

That moment. You know the one I mean.

The moment where you lose someone dear to you in a way that it affects you personally. A moment when you are at a loss as far as what to do. You may lose someone that you know but aren't all that close with and be able to get by without noticing any severe effects. But there will come a time when such a loss will hit hard and close to home.

In my life, I have seen many people and animals I know die. Family members. Friends. Acquaintances. A family member's pets. Even my own pets. 

I know I've been angry or frustrated in the past, but now I'm feeling a bit sad and lost.

In the past, I was pretty aware of my family tree. These days I keep a mental note of it, the dates of birth, how people are related, and so on. Some of those branches, however, have died and thus have a date of death attached to them. The first person in my family who died after I was born died the year I was born. It was my great grandfather, my mother's mother's father. Three (or five? 1992 or 1994) years later, when I was still very young, one of his daughters died, the first of the four "grand siblings". Three years later (1995) my maternal grandfather - my mother's father, died. This was the first major loss of someone I knew. I would visit him on the weekends when I was a young boy. The next year, his wife, my maternal grandmother, died. This was someone who lived on the floor below me my whole life to that point. We were fairly close, but I was still young. The thing about being young is that, when someone dies, you don't really understand the significance of it, because the concept is new and difficult to you. But when you're older, you know what's happening. Eventually, it gets to the point where you sort of accept it.

Then people on my father's side started to die. My paternal grandfather, of course, died three years before I was born, a fate I'm afraid my father might share at this rate. (My father was quite old when I was born) My paternal grandmother, on the other hand, lived until I was 9 or so. She was 88, about the same age as my maternal/maternal great grandfather. A few other people, some of my father's aunts and uncles, died in the late 90's. They were all quite old - in their 90's in fact. 

Back to my mother's side. One of her uncles died in 1997. After that, there were two great uncles left on my side, the last of that generation. One of them my mother's aunt's husband, and the other my mother's uncle. In 1999, one of my mother's sisters's former husband died. Apparently it was an unhappy incident involving the police. I'm told he was mentally unstable. It didn't sit well with my aunt, who had her first two children through him and the third through her second, current husband, someone I'm close with. As an aside, I visited my mother's blood uncle who lives out west one year, and while staying there, had a chance encounter with some kittens at a nearby barn. My sister and I each took one cat with us. The year was 1999.

Those cats took a long road trip back with us to our home on the east coast, and became members of our family. Of course, my mother already had an older cat. The three of them didn't get along well at first, but eventually, I think they did love each other. However, a few years later (I don't remember exactly when, but it had to be before 2003), the older cat was hit by a car and died. Of course, my mom didn't tell me that until years later. You know how that goes with kids and pets.

In 2001, my mother's uncle by marriage died, leaving only the uncle who lived out west. The uncle who lived out west had a wife who died sometime before him - I'm not sure when. The uncle who died in 2001 was 84 years old. Quite old for someone in my mother's family.

I must interrupt my "list of deaths" here to point out that an important event in my own life not involving death, per se, happened in the summer of 2002. My parents split up. It was the death of their time together, I suppose. I found out sometime later that they were never married. I was very upset with the break up, but I was almost more upset that we were going to have to move. The house was too big for my mother, my sister, and I, and certainly too big for just my dad. So we went to two new separate places. This marked the end of my town living in the "city" and marked the beginning of my time living in the "town". The town I moved to was just across the city border of my original home, so it wasn't far. However, it was a completely different environment. My father moved to another town, somewhat close by, but further away than where my mother moved. This year was the first time my father and I had gone to watch a new professional baseball team that had opened up in our city, but it would be the only year we would live there and watch the games. I would continue to go watch the games there and in fact am planning to do so in a few weeks when the season starts. Additionally, I went with my mother's uncle to a few of the games. I remember feeling sad when he was at the game, so it may have been a year or two later. But it may have been the same year, 2002. That was when everything changed for me.

I was the new kid at school. I had (I thought) a lot of friends at my old school and had trouble making new ones. I wasn't really the kind of person to make a lot of friends. But a few kids who lived on my street befriended me and starting playing basketball with me. I tried out for the team that year (it was 8th grade) but didn't make it. I made another pretty close friend that year, but he ended up going to a different school, so we didn't see each other as much.

During my first year at the new school, specifically the spring of 2003, my mother's father's second wife died. Though she wasn't related to me by blood, I considered her my grandmother. I had gone to visit with her pretty much every weekend since my grandfather died, back in 1995. So it was a hard loss for me. I think this was the first time I actually felt a loss personally, because I was old enough and had already started to become jaded by life. My parents had split up, and I had felt the harshness of reality. I even remember a baseball practice a short time after her death where I got hit by a long-toss pop fly in the face, and I blamed it on the death of my grandmother.  I was somewhat lost. But time went on and I continued to live normally, if not with some baggage, I guess.

The following year was ninth grade, the first year of high school. Many of the kids who went to 8th grade with me went to different schools, because they had the option to do so. That included a friend I mentioned above. During this time, I was still friends from the kids on my street, but a new group of friends started to come into the picture. Originally, I was good friends with one kid, and then I became friends with one of his friends. There were two other main friends in this group. Of these kid, I regularly only see the second and occasionally the fourth. There was also a fifth friend I didn't see as much but would become a good friend later on. In any case, this group of friends remained my closest friends from then until now. I now consider the second friend my "best friend" as he is the only one of the original group who I've regularly hung out with and talked to since then. By my second year of high school, circa 2004, this became my normal circle.

During that year, my mother's uncle died. He was the last member of that generation in my family. Though I liked him, I didn't see him that often and wasn't that close with him. His death did sadden me, however. After that family death, there weren't any until very recently. However, I still knew other people who had died.

In 2007, during the first summer after I graduated high school, I received a shocking phone call from a member of the football team's booster club, and a mother of one of the players. A teammate of mine (not her son) had been shot dead. I felt terrible about this because it was the first person I knew who had died unnaturally. My aunt's first husband had died in this way, yes, but I was very young and wasn't all that close, so it didn't affect me as much. However, this was different. Additionally, it was a murder, one that took many years to find justice. I was not close friends with him, but I always thought he was a good person and remembered a few conversations we had. I felt especially bad for the people in his grade who had to play football the next season without him. I also had met his mother and brother before, and knew they must be suffering. One light did come out of this, though. At the time, a girl in his grade was pregnant with his son. So I know at least that he left a legacy behind to be proud of. This kid was a great athlete. He was a good basketball player, and a star runner and football player. He had just started to turn his life around after some rough times. His death upset many, I feel, and I was one of them. But in the end, we weren't that close. I had my own things to worry about, namely, going to college.

Toward the end of the year 2010, my family would move again. My mother had been planning to move for years, but we wanted her to wait until both of us finished high school. My sister graduated in 2009, so it was possible to move then. Of course, I was still reluctant to move, but accepted my mother's decision. The house she moved into was the place her father and her father's second wife had lived until her death in 2003. Some time after that, a few of my cousins had moved into that house, and left sometime before we moved in. When we moved, we brought the cats with us, their third move, technically. My sister was still living with us in 2010, but sometime next year, she moved into her own place. She's always had it together, unlike me, who had little choice but to stay behind. 

It should be noted that around this time, I was struggling with my future. During the winter of 2009, I had an incident with one of my professors and was forced to stay out of the class. Though I passed that class, it was the last good semester I had in college. During 2010 and into 2011, my grades were sliding. I was on my way out, as it were. I had a job that allowed me to stay at the school and buy my own food. However, I stopped working in December 2010/January 2011 and was running out of money. In March 2011, I told my mother about what was happening. I went home. I hated my roommate and didn't live at school anymore. I continued to go to school until the end of the spring 2012 term.

However, before I get ahead of myself, I'm unhappy to say another death did occur during this time period. It was another "unnatural" death. This time, it was a cousin of mine. Sort of a "step-cousin" for several years, by the way of his relation, who has now been promoted to "full cousin" through a half-brother. Complicated, I know, but I want to keep some anonymity here. Apparently, this cousin of mine was involved in an incident with a group of kids. From what I understand, he was trying to break up a fight. However, things went south and he was... stabbed. He was the half-brother of my closest cousin, and my cousin was with him in the hospital when he died. I knew that had to be hard for my cousin and his father. To lose a son, I cannot even imagine what he must have thought. At the funeral, the pastor lady said she knew there was nothing to do to console us. It was very upsetting. It's the only funeral I can remember being to. I've gone to some wakes over the years, but the last time I went to a funeral, I must have still been a child. After the funeral, we all went out to lunch and I got to miss a day of classes so there were some "okay" things about that day but it was still very hard for me to accept what happened. However, as has been the case in the past, I didn't know the kid all that well. He lived with my cousin's stepfather's ex-wife until he started going to college, so I didn't see him much in his teenage years. He had a twin brother, an older sister, and a younger sister, in addition to his step-brother and half-brother. There was an awkward period where people mixed up the names of the twins after his death, but I knew I had to get it right. In the end, it was another very sad and unwelcome incident involving a family member. But we weren't all that close, so I wasn't affected much.

Since the end of 2012 I have been wandering through life, trying to figure out what I want to do. Is it okay to not want that much and just live a normal life? Or must I have great ambition? This is America after all. It's hard to accept the ways of this hyper-competitive society after all. Last year, I was working for my best friend's dad for a while, but then I got laid off in September. After that, I did a few odd jobs with my cousin, but I don't have any steady work. These things are hard for me to figure out. I'm not sure what to do now that I've screwed up in school. Even now I'm not really sure what I'm doing. But I know everything is coming to a head soon. But enough about my pathetic life.

Unfortunately, the list of deaths does not end there. Sometime last year (2013), my aunt's husband (my uncle, the one I said I was close with) lost his younger brother. We were all shocked by his death, as he was only 51. Even now, I'm not really sure what happened, but apparently it was "natural causes". It may have been a heart attack, I don't know. I went to his wake and talked with his three sons. I even saw some people from high school, a good friend of one of the sons who I played baseball with (he was a year above me) and his girlfriend, with whom I was in many of the same classes. She was a twin, so I always got them confused. Apparently, my uncle's brother was a bit of a wild child. My uncle was much the same way until a few years before I was born. Their other brother is an authority figure of sorts. He always had to watch out for them. It was a sad scene. I had met my uncle's brother a few times. He was a Bruins fan and we watched a few playoff games together at this sports bar with my uncle and his family. He was a pretty good guy, if not a little quiet, and maybe rough around the edges. This past season, I was with that family group and we watched a few games together. My uncle's brother's absence was noted and felt. While I did meet him a few times and liked him well enough, again, we weren't that close.

About two months ago, I got a call from my best friend, the one mentioned above. We hadn't talked in a while. I was pretty annoyed so I ignored him. A few days later, my cousin called - the one I'm close with and who had lost his half-brother a few years ago. He's a few years younger than me, but he works hard and makes a fair amount of money with his side jobs. He had four days off and asked if I wanted to hang out with him. I said sure. He lives off the mainland, so I have to take a ferry to visit him. After going on the island and helping him with a job (which I didn't know about until the night before so I was a little annoyed but didn't say anything), we went back on the ferry and hung out at my house for the night. We had planned it so we would leave to visit his friends in Connecticut the next day. But that next morning, I noticed my cat was acting a little strange. She wasn't moving and was making strange cries. I told my mother and she said she noticed when she left for work in the morning that something was up. She came home for lunch and checked on my cat. Somehow, I knew. I could tell that my cat was dying. She couldn't walk anymore, and she refused to eat anything. I was dazed. I didn't know what to do. Meanwhile, while this was going on, my cousin was running some errands. There are things he can only get on the mainland that can't be done on the island. I told him about it before he came back. My cat was dying, but I was planning to go on a trip. I considered not going but eventually decided to go with the original plan. But my cat was in my thoughts. 

While I was on my trip, I told my sister about the cat. My sister told my mom to take her to the vet and see what was going on. The next day, my mother called and told me it wasn't looking good. She even asked if I wanted her to have the cat put down. I told her I couldn't have that done while I was away. At this time, we were visiting a nice, picturesque park. I enjoyed this part of the trip, but the rest of it I didn't really care for too much. 

When I got back home the next day, my cat was still alive. She couldn't move or eat anything but her eyes were open and she was breathing. I basically spent the whole day with her. My mother and I took her outside for a little while just so she could be out in the fresh air one last time. Then we brought her back in. That afternoon and night I spent the whole time with my cat. When I went to bed that night, I slept next to my cat, who was in a pet bed on the floor. By the time I woke up the next morning, my cat had died. It was a Monday, but my mother had the day off, so she was around. My sister's cat inspected her body briefly and then turned around. We took the cat outside in a blanket, as we didn't have a box or anything. I kissed her on the head before we wrapped her up and became making preparations to bury her. We dug a hole a few feet deep so the cat could be buried and undisturbed. It was so hard, going through this. I had been to funerals before, but this was different. I decided that I would wear a nice shirt and pants for the occasion. We buried my cat in the back of the yard, over by the shed and out of the main yard. As we laid her to rest, we each said a few words. I said of my cat, she was a sweet cat, from the time she was a 6 week kitten back at the farm near my great uncle's house out west, until she grew old in our third house, and that I was going to miss her. I then started breaking down crying and hugged my mother. It was a strange moment. I don't usually get emotional about things like this, but I couldn't hold it in then. This was my cat. This was my friend for 15 years. I haven't had any other friends this long. Even my best friend and I went over a year without speaking during college. But this one stung.

I know what you're thinking. "What's the big deal? It's just some mindless animal!" While I guess I can understand what you're getting at, my life has been anything but normal. I haven't had all that many friends I could count on. I don't have great people skills. There was never really any stability in my life, with the family breaking up and the multiple moves. But my cat was always there, through it all, a loving companion. Someone I could rely on. I mentioned a few other reasons why this was hard for me above. But the real reason is, I have nothing else going on. I have nothing to fall back on. All I had to lift my spirits was my cat. Without her, I feel empty. There is a void in my heart. My moral center was my cat. Without my cat, I am lacking something. I no longer really care about anything or anyone, not the same way I did before anyway. I'm still nice to people I spend time with but I don't feel any real connection with them. My sister didn't really feel this. She has her own life. It also wasn't her cat. That's not really fair, though. She does miss them. It just doesn't bother her as much because she doesn't have time to care about little things like this. She's too busy being a responsible adult.

For a time, I was saddened by my cat's death. But there was still another cat in the house. My sister's cat. She did not move in with my sister when she left here a few years ago. I don't know if it was because she couldn't have here there, or because it would have been too much of a problem, or what. But she has been here. In the few years since my sister left, I had grown closer to her cat. My mother had grown closer to my cat. Essentially, my sister's cat became mine and my cat became my mother's. I feel this is generally a true statement, even though my cat will always be mine in my heart. The thing is, my cat was aging faster than my sister's cat. Until very recently, my sister's cat had been energetic and full of mischief. My cat was merely quiet, kept to herself, and was nice with my mother and I. The closeness I felt with my sister's cat was magnified after my own cat's death. She was the only cat left in the house. This was the first time we only had one cat since 1999. 

I know that, in a way, it was difficult for my sister's cat. She was used to being fed dinner with my cat, who was also her sister. We would divide one can of cat food into two plates for our cats to eat. But without my cat there, we had to either give her the whole can, or save half for later. For a time, my sister's cat ate whatever food she wanted on her plate. We tried giving her half a can and reheating the other one later. But she didn't really eat the food once it was reheated. Easter came a few weeks later. My sister came home and spent some time with her cat. On that day, someone gave my mother some Easter lilies. She put them in a vase somewhere in the house. At this time, my sister's cat seemed normal and happily spent some time with my sister. It would be the last time this would happen, unfortunately.

Sometime around a week later, my sister's cat started acting oddly. Her walking was labored, and she didn't jump as high. Her eyes didn't open very wide, and she developed a weak sounding cry. She stopped eating and going to the bathroom, except to urinate. Everything went down over a period of maybe 2 or 3 days. It happened so fast, we barely had time to react. I suggested that my mother take my sister's cat to the vet as soon as possible. She had an appointment scheduled for June, but I had a feeling it wouldn't be soon enough. The vet told us the cat probably had kidney failure or something similar and wouldn't make it very long. Because everything happened so fast, my mother and I didn't get into contact with my sister until it was late. My sister lives about 3 and a half hours away, and it's not easy for her to get over here. She also has a busy schedule. My mother didn't want my sister to have to come over here just so she could be saddened. But we ultimately decided telling her was the right thing to do. I spent a final day with the cat on May 1st. I spent most of the day just hanging out with the cat. When my sister came home the next day, she wanted to (understandably) spend most of the day with the cat by herself. I stayed out of her way pretty much and let them have some time together. My sister had called me the previous night, telling me to get rid of the lilies in the house because they apparently cause kidney failure in cats. I don't know if it was the cause, but it seems plausible. On the morning of May 3rd, after my sister had spent the night with her cat, the cat died. Sometime in the morning, my sister and mother buried her. I woke up to the sounds of them seemingly finishing up what was likely a very similar situation to what I had a month prior. My sister put some flowers on the graves, and some moss on her cat's grave, because she liked to roll around in the moss. Sometime later that day, my sister said goodbye to us and went back home. In a span of 26 days, both our cats, whom we had for fifteen years, were dead. 

Since then, I've been unsure what exactly to do with myself. A few days after my sister's cat died, I called my friend back, told him what happened, and hung out with him that weekend. His roommate was having a birthday party, and we watched the Bruins game. At that time, they were winning the series, though they would end up losing the following week. There were a lot of people there I didn't know. The only people I knew were my friend, his girlfriend, his roommate who was having the birthday party, his other roommate, and this one girl my friend went to college with. The party got kind of out of control for a while. There were a lot of people and the roommates were having trouble keeping them quiet. I talked with mostly the people I knew and a few other people I didn't know. The girl who didn't live there that I knew was an animal lover, so I thought we might talk about my cats but they never really ended up coming up. But we talked about some other things. Eventually she went home as there was nowhere to sleep. I couldn't leave so I slept on the kitchen floor. It wasn't that comfortable, but using the detachable chair cushion as a pillow made it livable. I woke up the next morning and left when the house was empty. It was a strange feeling.

As I noted earlier, I feel empty. I also feel that these losses have affected me more than my mother or sister or anyone else, for that matter. My sister has her own life, which she's still working through. My mother has her own life, which she's planning on retiring from soon. But I have nothing else. Without the cats during the day this house feels empty. Over the past several months, I've been replaying the video games from my youth and watching some shows from my younger days. I guess I'm trying to find a new center for my life. When I finish with this video game series, which will probably be sometime in June, I probably won't play any games for a while. I have some shows I still haven't watched, but there will certainly be a new hole in my life to fill. Maybe I will finally accomplish something with my life (I haven't really felt accomplished since high school), or maybe I will go completely insane. But something is going to happen. That's why I said things are "coming to a head". Father's day is in June. The new How To Train Your Dragon movie is coming out in mid-June. I plan to go see that with my mother. After that.... things are uncertain. 

In addition to all the deaths I have mentioned, my parents and their siblings and spouses are all getting older, and I fear that I am going to start losing them soon. I'm not sure I'm ready to handle these inevitable losses. If I can't deal with losing my cats, how can I possibly survive losing my parents, my aunts, and my uncles? When these deaths start happening, I will experience a sadness greater than any before. Even more than my cats. And I'm not sure I will be ready. If I can't start getting things together soon, then I will start having some real, serious problems among my family members. What will they think?

I'm not sure I want to make any new memories or form new attachments. Because many people have left me during my life, in one way or another. Either through death or simply fading away. I've never had a situation where a heated argument ended a friendship (although there might be one case where that's debatable) but these things do happen. You see, when you form a bond with someone, that bond is destined to be broken. This is simply the way the world works. People grow apart over time. No matter how much effort you give, you can't fight fate. And since I don't currently have anything going on, my future is uncertain. I fear something very bad may happen. I don't fear something good may happen. You see, fear, despite its negative connotation, implies that there is some possibility of success, however small. And I am not sure such a thing exists anymore. Not after such great loss.

Sunday, July 29, 2012

Politics, now in Sport form


Tim Thomas. Oh, Tim Thomas. If only you had just kept your mouth shut and played hockey. Then when you stopped playing, you could espouse all your bigoted views. Instead of doing it while you were still playing and there was a black president in office. Unless, of course, you actually are done playing. In which case, thanks for the Stanley Cup.

When he refused to go to the White House after winning the Stanley Cup, I first applauded him for being an individual. But I didn't realize what kind of "individual" he was. Then he supported Chick-Fil-A, like many asshole conservatives will do, saying marriage shouldn't be allowed to gay people and they can all go fuck themselves. And I put two and two together and realized he didn't go to the White House because he's a racist. Because he's a Republican.

Let me tell you about the Republicans. Obviously, not every person is the same, but the representatives of a party tend to hold similar views. They tend to be homophobic, racist, sexist, classist, and every other type of bigot you can think of. However, it's not as easy being a bigot in today's world. There's too many "smear campaigns" going on to call people out on their bullshit. You can't just run around shouting "I syure hates them black peeplz" or saying the n-word, or saying black people should go back to Africa. You have to be more subtle about it. But anyone who denies racism's existence and saying that race doesn't matter is fooling only themselves.

These days, politicians use "dog whistles", words that actually mean something else, such as "Mexican" meaning "the n-word" and "state's rights" referring to desire for slavery. People actually espouse racism all the time but it is more difficult to detect and is a form of "racism lite". For example, when talking about "welfare queens", people are actually talking about single black mothers. The idea is they are all this way because they are lazy, stupid, and careless. The idea that they are not given the same economic opportunities as white males is a foreign concept to racist whites.

Gays are also treated with utter disdain by the right wing, who claim they are an abomination. Every time someone argues for gay marriage, the gay bashing right wing will claim this does not represent a traditional (read: white Fundamentalist) version of marriage. Reason with them all you will that gays are human beings and deserve these rights; they do not care. They will claim that their (bigoted) opinion is perfectly valid and no one better ever question it. They will keep saying things like "oh, it's just a word, it doesn't mean anything. Just call it civil union and it'll be okay." not realizing what self-absorbed pricks they sound like.

The Grand Old Party has a rich history of marginalizing women. For a long time, women couldn't vote. It is well-known that women don't receive equal pay for equal work in the same job. Conservative values are very paternalistic and place women in a position where they must always be protected like the delicate flowers they are, and never allowed to make decisions for themselves.

The funny thing is, whenever these bigots are called out for being bigots, they will deny it and claim that the "godless liberals" are smearing them. Even so, they don't get called out enough. It is not just pundits and everyday joes who make these statements; conservative politicians do so as well.

Now I'm not saying the Democrats are so great either. They claim to be representatives of the real people, and not just the minority of rich people, but they frequently pander to the other party. They take a lot of crap from the neocons and don't call them out for their crap. Of course, when they do, no one supports them.

However, at least the Democrats are sometimes progressive. Whenever someone is getting in the way of human rights, it is a goddamned conservative. Slavery? Perpetuated by conservatives. Jim Crow? Formed by conservatives. Racial profiling? Supported by conservatives. Preventing women and blacks to vote? Conservatives. Gays in the military? Not if conservatives have anything to say about it. Need I mention gay marriage again? No, but I will do it again, because it proves my point.

In addition, conservatives want less government, less taxes, and less regulation on businesses. In other words they want corporations to do whatever the fuck they want for the sake of profit. Pollution, laying off jobs, shipping jobs overseas, paying wages as low as legally possible, etc. All for the almighty dollar.

Now, hold on, say the conservatives, human rights aren't everything! (In other words, we suck at human rights and/or don't give a shit about them, but anyway...) The conservatives, in addition to a social branch, also have a fiscal branch. Fiscal conservatives essentially consist of what I described in the last paragraph, but also basically claim they are brilliant businesspeople. The free market will save us all. How is the market free, exactly? And how is an unregulated market helpful to anyone except capitalists who make money at everyone else's expense.

I'm not really a fan of bipartisanship at all, to be perfectly honest. Having two major political parties that marginalize all the other parties may make them easier to recognize for the simpletons who need see the world in black in white, but it makes it a hell of a lot harder to have reasonable debates about anything. It doesn't matter what anyone besides the Republican'ts and the Democraps think anyway - they are not going to get elected. Individual thought doesn't matter at all in today's world - in fact, it is detrimental to survival. You must conform and pander to your party's base. You must suck the ass of the corporations, for they shall provide your campaign funds.You must preach your Christian views to the unthinking good old boys and claim that no matter how much life sucks, the afterlife will be better. After all, God wrote the book, not a person...right? It wasn't devised to control peoples' minds. At all.

Let's talk about the words Democrat and Republican.

Democrat: from democracy, meaning a government of the people, by the people; being one who supports the idea of a government of the people, by the people.

Republican: from republic, meaning a governing body consisting of elected representatives of the people.

The problem is, representatives don't seek the best interest of the people. They live for their own interests and push for legislation that helps their interests. Most of them are white, Christian, and rich and come from money. They do not care about the plight of the poor, or racism, or sexism.

The United States is a manchild bully that does not want to change its ways, no matter how overwhelming the evidence for a need for such change. High crime, bigotry, poor education, high unemployment. Being behind the rest of the developed world in many categories. But this isn't a problem because "God will save this country" because after all, this is "God's country." (not Israel or anything) Also, those other countries are "wimpy socialists" and "capitalism is God's gift" and all this other nonsense. People don't even hear themselves when they talk about this kind of stuff. But we need the military and all our for-profit prisons so badly! Without them, how would we ever survive? This country has one of the highest rates of imprisonment in the world, and half of the people in prison are in there for minor drug-related crimes, such as possession or use. And by the way, most of them are black.

Ever since 9/11, we have been an Islamophobic nation. But really, people are just afraid and hateful of people who look like they're south Asian (i.e., "brown people"), such as people from India, or Pakistan, or whatever. Moral panics are taken advantage of by people who want to make your life miserable. Now we have all this extra "security" at airports, which really consists of grope jobs, and no terrorist has ever been captured. But it's okay to violate all the Constitutional rights and shred those amendments like right to not be detained without reason on suspicion of being a "terrurists". Like Yoda once said, fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering. This is the basis of the Regressive Party.

Even with all this overwhelming evidence, Republicans continue to deny being pure evil. Americans deny that their government system needs reform. They deny that corporations need regulation. They deny that this country is slipping away. All to spite people in this country with actual problems. It's like a powerful corporation that receives government welfare, laying people off, and making its profits paying them next to nothing and doing no quality checks, complaining that someone below the poverty line, with no power, is some leech on society. Yeah, okay. There's a joke for you. I wonder how you people sleep at night. (On huge piles of money, haha) No, seriously. I hope you choke on your caviar.

Monday, July 16, 2012

In Defense of Joe Pa

Sigh.

I wouldn't normally feel the need to post on here, as I haven't in a long time, but I am in a ranting mode right now. With the recent treatment of Joe Paterno, you would think that he was the one molesting children. I would like to remind everyone that he was not. Maybe he didn't do enough to change the situation and maybe he did. I don't know, and don't act like you know. Unfortunately, it doesn't matter either way, because the ignorant masses have spoken. People think that by sympathizing with Joe Paterno, someone is sympathizing with Jerry Sandusky, and to a further extreme, the people who sympathize with him are, by the transitive property of insane, pedophiles and child molestors themselves.

 We live in a society which, while allegedly encouraging rugged individualism, actually wants no individual thought whatsoever. For example, Bill James, a well known baseball statistician, dared to claim that Paterno should not be getting the vitriol he is getting and in fact was not in a position to do much about the situation. The Red Sox released a statement claiming this is not the opinion of the Red Sox and the opinion of an individual and are shying away from it. Because James is a consultant for the Red Sox, he is not allowed to have an opinion of his own without people assuming it is the opinion of the "organization". I wasn't aware corporations could have opinions, but after all, they are people, so I shouldn't be surprised.

Too bad Joe isn't alive to defend himself, another reason why he is allowed to be defamed the way he has. I know the Freeh report was released earlier, but I guarantee most of those bashing Paterno have not read one sentence of it. And yet I read a comment on an article telling someone defending Paterno to "read the article". Yes, because of course, the person has read every sentence. Not hypocritical at all.

This is the world we live in, a punitive world where people are guilty until proven innocent, minority opinions are childishly dismissed without offering any rebuttal by those in the opinion of the majority, and the loud, obnoxious, punitive, police state, easily influenced by sensational things like this masses fuck everyone else over and marginalize their opinions. Sandusky got 600 something years in prison. He is not coming out. Are you satisfied? Of course not. Everyone else must suffer and be guilty of what one man did because that is how this society works. There is no due process of law anymore and everyone is guilty by association.

To those out here reading this, I know it is not fun to have an opinion that goes against what others say, but I encourage you to keep it and think critically. The powers that be do not want you to think, but you should do it. Fight that good fight. Stick to your arguments. It can be depressing to have an opinion that others shun, but if we can't have that, what kind of democracy are way? I believe in value outside of money, and I encourage others to do the same. Even if it doesn't always bring you happiness or traditional success, it will give you peace of mind.

Have a nice day.

-jduff


Tuesday, July 13, 2010

I AM BOSS

So long, Boss.

This morning, after hearing that David Ortiz won the home run derby, beating out Nick Swisher. George Steinbrenner, owner of the New York Yankees, died of a massive heart attack in his home.

I'm joking of course about the cause of death, and I apologize for that. It's hard to believe, but the boss of the Yankees organization since 1973 lives no more. His health has been in decline for several years now, and he recently turned over control of the organization to his eldest son, Hank. But still, the Yankees just won't be the same with him gone.

Just two days after long time Yankees public address announcer, Bob Sheppard, died at the age of 99, another longtime Yankee figure has died. It has certainly been a tough week for Yankee fans.

George Steinbrenner had a tumultuous and controversial history within the organization and throughout the sports world. His resume includes 7 World Series championships, from 1977-1978, 1996, 1998-2000, and 2009. But the methods by which he got these championships and his actions during his tenure are often seen as immoral or otherwise controversial. He had 23 managers in his time with the Yankees, the longest serving of whom was Joe Torre, from 1996-2007. Steinbrenner had a particularly adversarial relationship with Billy Martin, who he hired and fired 5 times during the late '70s and '80s.

The Boss also had a major hand in taking advantage of free agency and the lack of a salary cap in baseball. He is cited as a major reason why players are paid much more today than they were in the past, and in fact, more than most normal people are paid today. I imagine this had an influence on other sports, but he forced other teams to keep up with him somewhat and thus increased the average overall salary of MLB players significantly.

As a Red Sox fan, it's harder for me to feel bad about Steinbrenner's death than it is for me to feel bad about Sheppard's death. Sheppard was an announcer. He did his job with his voice, introducing players to the fans. He was known as the Voice of God in New York, and hearing your name announced by him was considered really making it in the big leagues. Steinbrenner was an owner, and a very aggressive one. He was an asshole to his managers and his players and he transformed baseball from the American pastime to a business of overpaid whiny bitch players who make more money than they could possibly ever need. The Boss, at least to me, represents most of what evil there is in this world. But as a person, I know, I didn't know him, and I hear that he was a nice guy and charitable and all. From 1990-1992, he was out of baseball for a "lifetime ban" which involved something involving digging dirt on Dave Winfield, one of his own players. But the ban was reduced to only a few years. Soon he was back, and within a few years he won a championship and started a short dynasty.

Of course, in the years from 1979-1995, Steinbrenner won exactly zero championships and yet these were the years of his most controversial actions. This was the era of wild manager firings and rehirings. George had a temper and couldn't accept failure. But by not giving managers a second chance, he did not allow the organization any stability. By the 1990's, I think George learned that this was not the way to do things, sticking with managers for longer and finally landing a winner in Joe Torre. It is said Steinbrenner was extremely tough, and unappreciative of everyone in the organization, including his son, Hank, who finally "did something" by winning a world series as owner. Of course, as I said, George was said to try to mend relationships he had trouble with and was charitable. There are positive and negative things about almost all people. No one is just one way or another. But truly, George was a polarizing figure.

The All-Star game is today. I was originally going to post an All-Star snubs team, but since George is stealing the headlines even in death, that hardly seems significant now. I'm sure there will be some sort of mention of George tonight, even though the game is in Anaheim, not New York. I don't understand why they say "massive heart attack" vs "regular heart attack." As if they are trying to make it seem more violent. I know it's not good to lie, but I think softening the truth would make it easier to swallow. Also, why is Pete Rose's lifetime ban not removed but Steinbrenner was so easily able to get back in? I guess it's because he's an owner. I don't know.

Overall, Steinbrenner's legacy is one of success but also of controversy. He won seven world series rings as owner, but it took 23 managers and an overhaul of baseball as a business (i.e. paying players a lot more and generally involving more money) to accomplish it. Yankees fans love him, but even they have their misgivings, I'm sure (some of them, at least). The rest of the sports world is jealous of his success or resents him for his actions. And, you may say that the rest of the league followed suit by paying players more and being more aggressive, but certainly he started the trend. Whether you love him or hate him, George Steinbrenner was undoubtedly one of the most influential figures in the business of baseball in the sport's history.

Friday, July 9, 2010

2010 MLB All-Star Snub Game

Problem, fans?

Ah, yes, it's that time of year again. Time for the MLB All-star game, but far more importantly, the discussion about who didn't make the all-star game and should have, and vice versa. Naturally, being a Red Sox fan, I'm pissed because Kevin Youkilis didn't win the final vote and Nick Swisher did. But of course there are other problems I have with it, as generally a fan of baseball itself.

First of all, there are several problems with the rosters themselves. Being in the American League has its advantages here. Both leagues have 34 representatives. However, the American League has 14 teams and the National League has 16 teams, so the AL gets more stars for its buck. And this year, the American League is correctly represented, for the most part. I don't have any problem with Cano starting (though I do take issue with him wussing out of the Home Run Derby). In fact, I don't have a problem with any of the starters. The Red Sox have had more than their fair share of injuries these year - recently to 3 players elected to the all-star game in the form of catcher Victor Martinez, 2B Dustin Pedroia, and starting pitcher Clay Buchholz. So these guys, despite being voted in, are most likely not going to be playing. Pedroia and Martinez have had other players fill in their roles, though I'm not as sure about Buchholz.

And these reserves are part of the problem. See, Ian Kinsler replaced Pedroia, and Joe Buck replaced Martinez. But there are other better players out there who deserve their spots, such as third baseman Michael Young of the Texas Rangers (Kinsler's teammate) and first baseman Paul Konerko of the Chicago White Sox. Of the all-stars on the final vote, despite my bias I feel Swisher was maybe fourth, ahead of Delmon Young, as far as players who deserved to go. Now, don't get me wrong- I think Swisher is having a very good year and has improved majorly as a hitter. But the only real reason he got to go was because he plays for New York, the largest Metropolis in the United States. Those other guys all deserve to go.

This brings me to my problems with the all-star game itself. I know, that ordinarily baseball is played with a roster of 25 players. The all-star rosters have grown in size over the years. But this is necessary because players who truly deserve to go keep getting left off. If you ask me, there should be 40 players on the roster. Also, each team does not need a utility player, as Bud Selig seems to think. If we have all these other guys around, and the game runs long, they will be available. I have always been of the opinion that we should be more inclusive and less exclusive. But I guess I don't understand the world that well. In addition, the all-star game should not determine home-field advantage in the World Series. It should just be a fun game because it is for the fans. The players should get to have fun too, not feel that huge pressure for a change.

Several AL players who got snubbed are: Kevin Youkilis, Michael Young, Paul Konerko (the final ballot guys), Felix Hernandez, Jered Weaver (bigtime), and Magglio Ordonez. There are more, to be sure, but these are the ones that stand out to me.

Anyway, on to the National League. There are many more snubs in this league by design, and more questionable selections. Especially at the catcher position. Miguel Olivo, who is FAR AND AWAY the best catcher in the NL, did not even make the team as a reserve. The fans voted in Yadier Molina because they love him so much and St. Louis fans are as populous and intelligent as house mice. Heyward was voted in despite lagging behind other NL outfielders, but he will not get to play due to injury. He was likely voted in because he will one day be a star, but he is not at that level yet. And neither is Stephen Strasburg. He started pitching, what, two weeks ago? I know he's great and he's going to be great, but he has not even played a full first half.

Also, Joey Votto, an MVP Candidate WAS NOT VOTED ON BY THE PLAYERS. He won the final vote. Honestly, I had been voting for Heath Bell, a closer for the Padres, but he made it by virtue of injury so the choice was fairly easy. Though, Billy Wagner is also having a stellar season as a closer for the Braves in his old age....I wish the Red Sox could have kept him. We really could have used him due to the retardation of the bullpen this year. Other problems include Omar Infante who has not even had a full season. I guess he's the utility guy but I don't really care. There are good starters in the NL who got snubbed, such as Mat Latos of the Padres, who have the best rotation in the NL. Ryan Zimmerman and Carlos Gonzalez, also on the final vote, will have a short vacation.

Overall, despite all the problems with the all-star game, it is still a good time. I suppose, as a Red Sox fan, I will be rather bored, considering only Beltre and Papi are going to be able to play at all, and Youk is not going. But still, it will be a good time. However, there are those like Miguel Olivo sitting on the outside who really should not be. It is the flawed system of the all-star roster making that I hope one day will be fixed. Every year it is like this, though, so I'm not really expecting a change. The game will be played in Anaheim on July 13. I wonder what the pre-game festivities will consist of this year. Maybe Youkilis and Papelbon will get to go if some other team suffers some of the injuries we have this year. But for now, Youkilis is a spectator, watching another Yankee douchebag get voted in by a vast legion of New Yawkas.